|
|
|
| |
The first Final Destination brought about a set of teens
experiencing freak of nature accidents and strange occurrences
in death. The second is somewhat similar. This time around
death is back with a vengeance, or to say that hes
back to tie up loose ends because of one surviving person,
Clear Rivers. Clear, who wishes to stay in a mental ward
is asked for help by one of the survivors of a deadly car
wreck who saw the accident in a premonition. Like the first,
the survivors fight to stay alive and many fall into a sort
of once in a lifetime chance accident happenings.
I hadnt seen the first Final Destination and I found
it quite intriguing that the story was thought about without
over emphasizing the necessity of real acting. I got an
idea of the possibility that as people you never know how
safe we are, how secure things are around us, and the question
of the higher being at work. The film is directed by David
Ellis and has also done Armageddon 1998. The subject matter
that he brings to film is what caught my attention. Its
the kind of stories that ask the what if question.
Questions that I particularly ask is, Is that possible
and it is, so what if? In Final
Destination 2, I see many questions coming to me in this
form. I believe situations that occur and place us in death
can be questioned in how it happens, but not why. The characters
of the film go through such parole and mental pain that
everything they do gets to a point of feeling like nothing
around them is safe and it makes them go into a fret of
panic. One important factor that the story brings is the
relation of the first final Destination. It was not implicated
until half way through the film that Clear Rivers was seen,
hence audiences related her to the first. Then when the
characters began to talk about how they managed to dodge
death in a so-called coincidences, they discovered amoungst
them that they all knew somebody from the incident of the
first Final Destination. The filmed runs about an hour and
a half and has tons of blood, gore, drugs, and language,
for mature audiences only.
-by Jennifer Nacino
Headlines
|
| |
In this sequel to Shanghai Noon, Chon Wang (Jackie Chan) and
Roy OBannon (Owen Wilson) get together for another adventure.
This time Chons sister Lin played by Fann Wong has witnessed
their fathers murder and is out to get revenge and to retrieve
the imperial seal. With the help of her brother Chon and his
friend Roy, they cross the seas to London to help Chons
sister. They meet up with adventure, fun, and learn a lesson
on friendship.
The film directed by David Millar and written screenplay by
Miles Millar and Al Gough, the action placed Jackies
character in yes, looking like it was all natural. His character
seemed to be more so the kind of guy that doesnt want
any trouble, yet when he is bothered by the bad guy he manages
to jump into action and display the funny side that everyone
loves him for. Jackie Chan is also the Executive producer
for the film and his brother help out also, but Im not
sure of what his first name is.
The Genre of this film is action, comedy, and sequel and is
rated PG-13 for the action violence and sexual content. In
my opinion the film is certainly great for the comedy, but
the beginning is much better then the last one. I also love
the fact that there are always outtakes at the end of the
film. Most of the films that Jackie Chan has done all
have some kind of outtake. In Shanghai Noon and in Shanghai
Knights Jackie makes it fun for everyone by incorporating
the whole cast.
-by Jennifer Nacino
Headlines
|
| |
Martin Scorsese works his unique ability to tell a one of
a kind story in "The Gangs of New York." With its
colorful and well acted cast, Leonardo Di Caprio, Daniel Day-Lewis,
and Cameron Diaz, the film weaves a sharp view of a violent
world that was almost forgotten. It seems Scorsese's vision,
what some might claim as outlandish in "Gangs,"
takes on a vibrant life of its own, showing the audience a
history almost forgotten and an aura of a young city.
-by Ian Paul
Headlines
|
| |
When Hollywood came out and started movies they also started
trailers and the trailers were suppose to tease the viewer
into seeing the movie, well this was the teaser that was told
the second I saw the film.
Charlie Carbone played by (Jerry O’Connell) was only
12yrs old when he was drowning and was saved by Louis Booker
(Anthony Anderson). They became friends since and life has
thrown them in the mix. Until Charlie’s step father
who is head of the mafia gets fed-up with him and his friend
Louis. He gives them a simple job in Australia that goes terribly
wrong and involves a kangaroo.
I couldn’t help, but wonder if they were trying to target
the children in the audience or the adult audience. One of
the interesting things they managed to depict is the friendship
of the characters. Children wouldn’t understand some
of the dialogue that they had in this film. I’m almost
positive that Louis Booker had gotten laughs out of almost
everyone in the audience. When there were clumsy, clunky,
funny situations these are the parts that the kids mostly
enjoyed. The whole audience enjoyed this film. My guess is
that mainly the fact that it’s something that the family
would enjoy. That’s why I went with my neighbor and
her kids.
Along with the film, at the end there is also what I call
“Kangaroo outtakes.” This is where the kangaroo
does some of his own comical stuff and even does something
from the Austin Powers, the Spy that shagged me. (Not that
I even seen it, but I know where it’s from). I always
think that films that have outtakes at the end show the audience
the other side of the filming aspect to seem light hearted
and fun added into the production of filming.
In any case the film had fluked out on the trailers and commercials,
but given the story and the comical idea placed in the film
it turns out for the younger generation of people. If you
have children to see it with, go bring them. If not, it’s
definitely something to rent (on sale!) or purchase as a gift
for someone with children.
-by Jennifer Nacino
Headlines
|
|
| |
|