MetOnline Logo
Google

Vol. 26 Issue 16 ~ October 23, 2003
 
Home  
Events Calendar
 
About Us
Archives
Staff
Job Application
 
Suggest a story
Advertising Rates
Place classified ads
Gift Shop
 
Metrosphere
Met Report
Met Radio
Student Handbook
Office of Student
Publications
Reporters' Resources
 
Welfare System’s not perfect, but better off now
Bryan Goodland
Columnist
Bryan Goodland

When the federal government revamped the welfare system in 1996, many thought this was going to lead to disaster. However, recent statistics are showing that the much-needed reformation has worked.

The New York Times stated that out of the $25.4 billion spent on the program in 2002, $11.2 billion of that was spent on cash assistance and $14.2 billion on non-cash benefits. The focus of the welfare system or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, as it is now called, is to spend money on things like child-care, workforce training, and emergency assistance rather than on monthly cash payments.

The change that occurred with the 1996 law was the requirement that most of the adults who received aid would need to begin working within two years of the receipt of their first check. The law also gave states autonomy in running their programs and provided them with lump- sums of money in order to carry out the process. The laws didn’t take the welfare system away, but altered the way in which it would operate. Basically, the system changed from being one in which people were encouraged to stay in the grasp of poverty to one that will hopefully enable people to rejoin the workforce and sustain themselves.

The entire philosophy behind this program has changed. Everyone heard about the people who manipulated the system to their own benefit. While the new program is, of course, not without faults, it has made some major strides forward. The program is now focused on supplying needy families with support, rather than just free government handouts. By refocusing on non-cash benefits, the system now allows people to return to or look for work while still being able to support their families. Paying for expenses like child-care, job training, mental health care, and drug abuse treatment allows those who are motivated to seek employment an opportunity to do so, without being mired in an ever-increasing mound of debt.

The new figures look hopeful and provide the necessary data which seem to show that the system works. Of course, this is a government program and because of its size, can be unwieldy. Giving greater authority to the states will help to manage the system, but it also makes overseeing the funds much more difficult. The potential for dishonest people to take advantage of the system is still there. In this day and age, the stories of mismanaged funds are never farther away than the front page of any newspaper, so the government will have to watch this new program carefully.

The basic ideas behind welfare are good ones and are at the heart of what America is and should continue to strive to be; a nation that doesn’t overlook its poorest few and a nation that struggles to ensure that everyone gets a piece of the American pie. Only time will truly tell if this system is actually working or if these figures are just a fluke and really only look good on paper. The welfare program used to be a system that kept the poor entrenched in poverty and offered very little as far as a solution to the problem.

The system was the typical government band-aid that hid the scar rather than helping the wound to heal. This new program offers people a real chance to achieve financial stability and to leave the welfare system far behind. Hopefully, in their pursuit of financial independence, they just may get a glimpse of the American dream. In the end, that makes the changes worth their weight in gold.

 

Return to Index

 
The Met Online is a student-produced online version of the weekly student-produced The Metropolitan newspaper, both operating under the direction of the Metropolitan State College of Denver Office of Student Publications.
 
All Rights reserved 2003, The Metropolitan
For feedback and questions