Skip Navigation - Search the MetOnline

Metonline Logo
Powered by Google

Volume 27, Issue 14, November 11, 2004

News

Youth voter turnout high; some expected different results

by Adam Goldstein
The Metropolitan

In this year’s highly charged and hotly contested electoral atmosphere, expectations were high for the youth vote.

Both sides competitively courted potential voters between the ages of 18 and 29 as political activism found its niche in popular culture.

Poll results indicate that the mass encouragement worked. At least 20.9 million Americans under the age of 30 voted in this year’s election, a national jump of nearly 10 percent from 2000.

The youth vote increased even more in the 10 most competitive “battleground states,” where turnout jumped 13 percentage points from 2000 to peak at 64 percent. This trend mirrored the higher general turnout in these coveted electoral battlegrounds.

“I think what’s interesting at this point is the actual census data,” said David Schwartz, Auraria Campus Organizer for the New Voters Project.

51.6 percent of eligible young voters turned out this year, a number that fell below some expectations.

“The voter turnout among college students our age was low,” said Danielle Robinson, vice chair of the Colorado College Republicans. “It was higher than in past elections, but not exactly the turnout that was expected.”

Despite the record number of young voters in this year’s election, the high turnout of all voters and the ultimate defeat of John Kerry undermined the impact of their contribution.

The results of the election challenged a widespread assumption that young voters would follow a predetermined pattern.

“I think people associated the young voter turnout with a large Kerry turnout, which is a misconception,” Schwartz said. “The young people are split, too.”

The increased political activism among young voters made them a commodity for pollsters and partisans alike, especially in the decisive electoral states.

“Young voters became a target in battleground states (because) politicians realized that young voters have the potential to affect the election results either way,” said New Voters Project employee Ben Prochazka. “I think that, from a campaign standpoint, this year there were actually ads targeting young people.”

Whatever the split, young voters were the only age group that swayed the Democratic party. Kerry carried the youth vote 55 percent to 42 percent, according to national exit polls.

“I think that more young people voted for Kerry because of his stance on education and his energy policies,” said Nathan Pitman, co-president of the Democrats of Auraria.

“I also think students tend to be a little bit more informed.”

The success of the Kerry/Edwards ticket among young voters indicated a shift away from a third-party candidate. In 2000, Ralph Nader received 4.7 percent of the youth vote, a number that dropped to 1 percent in 2004.

“I think this was a way more highly contested and contentious election than in 2000,” Prochazka said. “People thought there was more riding on the decision between the two major candidates than the idea of electing a third party candidate.”

In the end, regardless of the outcome, this election demonstrated how high youth activism has the potential to sway results.

“The fact that there was political money being spent on young people—I think it’s groundbreaking,” Prochazka said.