Home > Metrospective
Burns comes to Starz
Acclaimed filmmaker explores human side
of historic conflict
By Adam Goldstein
goldstea@mscd.edu
|
|
| Filmmaker Ken Burns stands outside
of the Starz FilmCenter Aug. 26. Burns premiered clips
from his new film, The War, which examines WWII from
an American perspective. The series, which is over
14 hours long, will premiere on PBS in September 2007. |
|
When director Ken Burns finished The Civil
War, his 11-hour examination
of the war between the states, he swore off any further documentaries
about epic conflict.
“I didn’t want to be typecast,” he said at
the Starz FilmCenter Aug. 26.
But in the mid-’90s, a disturbing
set of statistics made his resolve waver.
“The National Council for History Education came out with
a study that said that 40 percent of graduating high school seniors
think
that we fought with the Germans against the Russians in the Second
World War,” he said. “That’s 40 percent of
graduating seniors – not failing, not flunking.”
These
widespread historical misconceptions were only a part of his
inspiration to address such a sprawling topic. The second
was the rapidly diminishing store of first-hand testimony.
"We were losing 1,000 veterans of the Second World War a day
in the U.S.,” he said. “It represented in some ways
memory being lost from our hard drive.”
Both of these factors
were unsettling for a filmmaker who has devoted his career to
the cinematic upkeep of historical memory.
The director’s
documentaries have targeted such sprawling and multi-tiered topics
as the West, jazz, baseball and the Civil
War. He’s turned an unflinching and probing lens on cultural
and literary figures like Mark Twain and Jack Johnson.
His newest
documentary, The War, examines World War II from a uniquely American
perspective. The film seeks to tell the story
of the conflict from the vantage of four small American towns:
LaVerne, Minn., Mobile, Ala., Sacramento, Calif. and Waterbury,
Conn. The War aims for an intimate and immediate perspective,
a structural departure from The Civil War, which highlighted
the conflict’s high-profile political and military figures.
“In The Civil War, we were trying to do simultaneously
a top-down and bottom-up look at that war,” Burns said. “In
this film, we decided to focus on so-called ‘ordinary’ people … We
were looking for an experience of the Second World War in the
most visceral and experiential way, (and) at the same time trying
to tie together a common American experience.”
The result
is a highly personal, instinctive view of war. Burns follows
the paths of American soldiers as they wade through the
horror, the loss and the devastation of the 20th century’s
most destructive and brutal conflict. Through interviews and
historical footage, The War follows the major developments of
the war through the eyes of American servicemen and their families
back home.
Burns screened approximately an hour of the seven-part,
14-hour series for a capacity crowd at Starz. The full film will
premiere
on PBS September 2007.
Burns premiered footage from the upcoming
series at Starz, fielding questions and encouraging dialogue
from the audience.
“This is very much going to be your night,” Burns
said to the crowd.
Though the intermittent clips from the series’ prologue
and episodes painted a frenetic picture of the series as a whole,
Burns’ overarching approach tied the disparate segments
together. From the Battle of Saipan in the Pacific to the American
liberation of Poland’s concentration camps, the film attempts
to infuse the war’s major events with an individualized
and immediate perspective.
The film is Burns’ attempt to clarify World War II’s
legacy, to challenge the status quo of history and to illustrate
in words and images the true toll of the war.
“We’re going back to an experience that has been so calcified
with the wrong kind of signals,” Burns said. “We
called it ‘the good war’ – there’s no
such thing as a good war. I think that we’ve tended to
see the Second World War in a kind of casual, distanced, celebratory
way. I tried to circumvent a lot of the clichés and move
beyond them, to restate them in a new way without being didactic.” |