Home > MetNews
Honors director steps down amid disagreements
By Allison Bailey
abaile19@mscd.edu
|
|
| Adolph Grundman will step aside
after 10 years at the helm of the honors program. He
is proud of the program he created and hopes his succesor
will garner more support for the program. |
|
Director of the Metro Honors program, Adolph Grundman, is stepping
down after 10 years in the position due to changes in the program.
“I think the major reason was a change in the philosophy
of how they wanted to identify my responsibilities,” Grundman
said. “I’m not in any way bitter. I thought the job
description was changed in a way that would make it difficult
for me to do what I like best, which is working with students.”
Recruitment
was an area of contention for Grundman.
He said the administration
wanted him to visit high schools to recruit students for the
honors program, which he didn’t
find effective.
He said they also wanted him to take a major role
in fundraising, which he has no experience with.
“I just wasn’t convinced I was going to be effective
at that,” Grundman said.
Linda Curran, Director of Academic
Affairs at Metro, said the administration is currently reviewing
applications for an interim
director.
“What I can say is that with this change in leadership
we are going to take advantage of that decision to make some
changes
that will help lead the college towards preeminence,” she
said.
According to Grundman, the size of the honors program was
a critical issue.
He said the administration thought the program, which usually
has between 80 and 100 members, was too small for a school of
roughly 20,000 students.
The administration never gave him a
clear idea of what they felt would be an appropriate number of
students for the program, he
said.
Douglas Petcoff teaches honors biology and said one reason
for the small size of the program is that a large portion of
Metro’s
students do not come here right out of high school.
Petcoff said
that half of the students transfer from community colleges and
are not willing to participate in the general studies
block of the honors program.
“That may be one reason,” Curran said. “That
doesn’t
appear to necessarily be true at all other institutions. This
is one of the things we want to work with the new interim director
when they are named. There are honors programs at similar colleges
that are bigger than ours.”
Stephanie Guerra, a member of
the honors program, said she feels the college does not put an
emphasis on the program.
"We don’t get enough attention academically and that
reflects the number of students in the program,” she said.
Guerra
thinks that is reflected in the funding towards the program.
“That’s one of the things that we want to change,” Curran
said of the program’s funding problems.
“If we are going to grow then it seems to me that the
college would have to invest in scholarships,” Grundman
said.
However, he said he didn’t feel the college was willing
to do that.
Petcoff felt that it shouldn’t be solely the
responsibility of the director to promote the program.
“The incoming freshmen are over at the advising office
and the advising office evidently isn’t pushing the honors
program,” said
Petcoff. “I didn’t know it existed here until one
of my students mentioned it. He said, ‘You ought to teach
History of Science. It’s in the honors program.’ I
said, ‘There’s an honors program?’”
Another
reason for the program’s lack of visibility on
campus is Grundman was only given three hours release by the
administration to work on the program, Petcoff said.
“If you want people to develop a higher profile than that,
you’re
going to want to give them more than three hours release,” he
said.
Curran said the new program director will receive six hours
release, which was never offered to Grundman.
“Three credit hours is one thing if you’ve been
doing it for 10 years,” she said. “We are assuming
that a person coming in will have a learning curve. Also, we
want them
to be doing something different and something more.”
According
to Curran there will be an interim director named sometime before
the last week of September, although she said she didn’t
know how long it would be before the program had a new permanent
director.
“I have no regrets,” Grundman said. “It was
10 years well spent. I enjoyed working with the faculty and the
students.
I just had a great experience and I want to see the program flourish.”
Grundman
plans to continue teaching in the history department. |