Home > Insight
I'll
huff, puff and piss Auraria off
By Matthew Quane
mquane@mscd.edu
It is rare that I use the term “whiny liberal” with
disdain. When the words escape my mouth, they are generally in
self-jest. But now I have a worthy candidate for the moniker:
those attempting to enact a campus-wide smoking ban.
I agreed with the clean-air activists when they pushed their
indoor smoking ban on Colorado. It was the sort of propaganda
that could make Phillip Morris envious. I can understand why
nonsmokers want – nay, deserve – clean air in work
environments and restaurants.
I do not understand the bar ban, though. Does anyone go to
a bar for health-conscious reasons, other than to exercise their
ever-important liver?
An outdoor smoking ban is one bandwagon I cannot jump on. It
verges on being, well, whiny.
The complaints from nonsmokers bear a striking resemblance from
case to case. They are upset that smokers huddle en masse around
the entranceways of buildings and force the whiners to take a
deep breath of self-righteousness before they skirt into the
safe air of the building.
I admit I am a fairly casual smoker.
I can often be found in front of the Tivoli, smoking with my
compatriots on brief breaks
from the stress of producing a weekly student newspaper. I took
one while writing this column.
And smokers are well aware of the health risks associated with
smoking. It is impossible for any American not to be. Television
inundates viewers with anti-smoking ads paid for by cigarette
companies. And we are reminded every time a health-conscious
passerby goes out of their way to inform us that cigarettes kill
or waves their hand in front of their face in an oh-so-pretentious
manner.
The Silver and Gold Record, UCD’s faculty and staff newspaper,
quoted Auraria Higher Education Center board member Larry Lopez
asking why nonsmokers must “fight their way through smoke” to
get to a building. Now, Larry, I would not consider myself to
be in peak physical condition, but if you have to “fight” your
way through smoke, you should really hit the gym.
There remains the ever-present argument that the offensive
odor of cigarettes permeates the entryways and lingers long after
smokers have retreated to their offices and classrooms. Of
course,
if we begin banning offensive odors, we will have to add Bathing
1010 into our freshman curriculum. Sorry, Mr. Hippie, but those
skanky dreadlocks have got to go.
All jokes aside, the issue comes down to personal liberties
and the exercise thereof. While this campus may house its
share of
simpletons, we have to respect the lifestyle choices they
make.
If the ban is passed, Auraria may have to face a smoker uprising,
the likes of which I would be unafraid to lead. Defiant smokers
already ignore the signs instructing them to perform their
smoky deeds 20 feet from the buildings. More legislation
would only
embolden us.
I can envision the backlash now: packs of unrepentant smokers
roving the campus like wolves, circling nonsmokers like
prey, huffing and puffing ashy retribution.
I have seen the future. It tastes of revenge and fine Turkish
blends. |