Home > MetNews
Anorexia treatment makes a house call
New method to treat eating disorders gets families
involved
By Allison Bailey
abaile19@mscd.edu
|
|
| Daniel le Grange, Assistant Professor
of Psychology at the University of Chicago, speaks
during an eating disorder conference at the Tivoli
Turnhalle on Friday. |
|
Mental health professionals and families of
adolescents with anorexia nervosa gathered in St. Cajetan’s
Center on the evening of Nov. 1 to discuss a new form of treatment
for eating
disorders called the Maudsley method.
The conference was hosted
by the Center for Effective Intervention, which is part of the
Human Services department at Metro. James
Lock, an associate professor of child psychology at Stanford
University, and Daniel le Grange, associate professor of psychology
and director of the eating disorders program at the University
of Chicago, spoke at the conference.
“I’ve been treating kids with anorexia nervosa for
15 or 16 years and about eight or nine years ago I read about
this
approach … I’ve become quite convinced that it is
a very reasonable treatment for a lot of kids with (anorexia
nervosa),” Lock said. “It’s effective for probably
70 percent of them.”
Lock said the purpose of the conference
was to educate parents about the treatment approach so they can
make informed decisions
regarding their child.
Commonly known as anorexia, anorexia nervosa
is an eating disorder that is both a physical and emotional problem
that can become
life threatening, according to WebMD.
A person suffering from
anorexia has a fear of gaining weight, limits the amount of food
he or she eats and can become dangerously
thin. Severe or long-term anorexia can lead to starvation, health
problems and even death.
According to David Bernstein, director
of the Center for Effective Intervention, Children’s Hospital
is the only institution in the area that uses aspects of the
Maudsley method.
“I don’t believe there is anybody who is doing exactly
what Lock and le Grange do in the area,” he said, adding
that Children’s Hospital and many other private therapists
in the area are interested in using the method as part of their
treatment.
After a brief explanation of the method, the doctors
addressed
questions from the 50 or so parents and professionals in attendance.
“You came here tonight to talk to us, rather than listen
to us talk to you,” le Grange said.
Most of the questions
were about the specifics of the method and how it works.
Developed at the Maudsley Hospital in England,
the Maudsley method takes a family-involved approach to treating
eating disorders
rather than using more traditional methods.
Most treatment methods
for anorexia call for hospitalization regardless of medical need
and most keep parents out of the treatment
loop. While a patient is institutionalized, professionals monitor
their eating and weight gain.
On release the patient is responsible
for maintaining a healthy weight and family members are usually
not involved in that aspect
of the treatment. Also, traditional methods focus more on mental
causes of the anorexia, rather than treating the physical symptoms,
according to Lock and le Grange.
Both said they had seen many
cases in which patients gained weight while they were hospitalized,
but lost most of that weight after
release, causing a cycle of hospital stays.
In contrast, the Maudsley
method only recommends hospitalization if it’s necessary
for the immediate health or survival of the patient. Parents
work closely with a professional to ensure
that the patient eats properly and gains weight.
Initial emphasis
is placed on treating symptoms of the illness – such
as dangerously low weight – and addressing causes at a
later stage in the treatment.
“When you look at the relapses that occur in the traditional
treatment of the disease and the multi-hospitalizations, it is
so good
to see a treatment where you aren’t seeing that,” Bernstein
said.
At the conference Lock and le Grange said that in three
different studies of the method, 80 to 90 percent of the patients
maintained
weight five years later. No studies have been done past the five-year
mark, they said.
However, the treatment must be employed with
the supervision of a professional.
The Maudsley method keeps patients
in their home environment, and parents use the same techniques
to make their children eat
as they do to make them do their homework, according to Lock
and le Grange.
One parent at the conference suggested alternative
methods of leverage, such as not allowing teenagers to get their
driver’s
license until they reach a healthy weight, or punishing children
when they refuse to eat.
“It’s a simple thing, but not an easy thing,” the
parent said.
Lock and le Grange compared anorexia to cancer. They
pointed out that a parent would not quietly sit by if their child
refused
treatment for cancer and asked why anorexia should be treated
any differently.
“There’s no difference between anorexia and cancer,” le
Grange said. “Both kill.” |