Home > MetNews
Laptop stolen, student data compromised
By Geof Wollerman
gwollerm@mscd.edu
A laptop computer containing the names and Social Security
numbers of 988 former Metro students was stolen from a faculty
member’s
office, according to a notice sent out by Metro President Stephen
Jordan.
The incident happened less than two weeks after Metro
administrators approved new safeguard policies regarding students’ personal
information. According to the notice there is no evidence that
personal information from the laptop had been retrieved or misused.
Shortly after 2 p.m. Feb. 28, psychology professor Pamela Ansburg
notified the Auraria police that a laptop had been stolen from
her office where it was left in its docking station unattended,
according to the police report. The door to her office may have
been propped open during the incident, Ansburg told police. An
officer from the Denver Police Department crime lab was unable
to obtain any evidence at the scene.
“Right now we don’t have any information as far
as a suspect goes,” said John Egan, deputy chief of the
Auraria police.
Ansburg offered no additional comments when contacted
about the theft.
The theft comes almost exactly a year after
an admissions staff member’s laptop containing the personal
information of 93,000 students was stolen from his home. Since
then, Metro has
been pursuing policies aimed at preventing information theft.
As
of last spring Metro mandated that all access to private student
information should be approved by the president’s office,
said campus spokeswoman Cathy Lucas. According to Jordan’s
notice, Metro is looking into why personal student information
was on Ansburg’s laptop, and the investigation may lead
to disciplinary action.
“I think it’s very critical that all employees respect the
privacy of student information. We all have the responsibility
to do that as faculty and staff,” Lucas said.
“We’re currently in the process of completing a
project that was implemented after last spring to have college-owned
laptops turned over to the Department of Information Technology
for review of the data contained on their hard drives,” Lucas
said.
Ansburg’s laptop did not make it through this review,
she said.
Until further developments in the case, the incident is considered
only a theft. To be considered identity theft, a person whose
identity was stolen would have to file a separate report detailing
the misuse of their identity, Egan said.
If the laptop were part of an identity crime there would be
a better possibility of tracing it back to a suspect, he said.
Criminals who traffic in identity information are typically
much smarter than other criminals, said Ralph Rojas, a criminal
justice
professor who recently gave a presentation on identity theft.
“Someone who is very good at computer forensics can retrieve
information from a computer that has been deleted,” Rojas
said.
No information is safe, and there are mechanisms that can
be
used to retrieve any data that has ever been on a computer, he
said.
“The only thing that is safe is if you have the programs
that are one step ahead of everybody else,” Rojas said.
The new security measures Metro uses are pretty good because
they force users to choose a complicated password that has to
be changed every six months, Rojas said.
However, the real issue is not information security. What the
college should focus on is securing the hardware that the information
is stored on, Rojas said.
“I think that a solution to preventing this from happening
again … is
to hold people responsible,” Rojas said. He mentioned the
example of a gun owner who can be held liable for a shooting
involving their gun even if it was taken from their house without
their knowledge.
“The person who received the laptop needs to be responsible
for it,” Rojas said.
Egan said the theft is ultimately Metro’s responsibility.
“It’s their equipment, their responsibility. Why all this
information was on a laptop, I don’t know,” he
said.
According to the Auraria police crime logs, a total of
at least
17 laptop and desktop computers have been reported stolen on
campus since the laptop theft last spring.
“Years ago it used to be typewriters. Now it’s laptops because
they’re easy. Everybody has one,” Egan said.
Office doors are often left open around campus, and thieves
who work the area take advantage of the open nature of the
campus,
he said.
“If they can see anything of value, they’re going to go
ahead and take it,” Egan said.
It may be easy for a student to have access to an office, but
it is just as easy for a thief off the street to wander around
campus looking for opportunities to steal, he said.
“With so many students and so many different people down
here, what’s suspicious and what isn’t? A thief could
come in dressed as a student … and basically get away with
it,” Egan
said.
The main thing to remember is keep your belongings locked
up or keep them with you, he said.
"Laptops are a problem. Maybe next year it’ll be
Blackberries … whatever
the next new thing is that’s easy to steal and people
leave laying around,” Egan said. |