Skip Navigation - Search the MetOnline

Metonline Logo
Powered by Google

Volume 26, Issue 35, april 29, 2004

Opinion

Rafting the rapids of "Peace Like a River"

by Jennifer Goodland
Guest Columnist

"People fear miracles because they fear being changed-though ignoring them will change you also... No miracle happens without a witness. Here's what I saw. Here's how it went. Make of it what you will."

Leif Enger's "Peace Like a River" opens and closes on the nature of miracles, though some may say the true miracle of this book is its very presence on "best novel of the year" lists. This is not to say it's a bad book. In fact, it's very good, and it was an ideal choice for Denver's "One City, One Book" program, which started in March. But its high praise by media from San Francisco to New York is not without controversy.

Reuben "Rube" Land, the asthmatic narrator of the book, lives with his sister Swede, who is obsessed with Zane Grey and poetry about outlaws and the Old West. Rounding off the Land clan are Rube's brother Davy and his father Jeremiah. The mother has, some years prior, left the family, but where she went and why are unimportant. Jeremiah Land has the ability to perform miracles small and large, though most people ignore this ability and Land refuses to exploit it even if he could figure out how. Two school bullies run afoul of Davy and Jeremiah and eventually break into the boys' house bent on revenge. This ends badly, with Davy on trial for killing the two boys.

Things Ending Badly is essential to the plot of most books, even the Winnie-the-Pooh series, though A.A. Milne left gunplay out of his tales in favor of simpler problems like Eeyore losing his tail. Davy responds to his inevitable imprisonment by escaping to who-knows-where, dodging a manhunt, and triggering in Swede's mind a connection between the outlaw poetry she writes and her life. The family goes on a quest to find Davy, though what they intend to do if they find him isn't clear to any of the Lands.

The novel's not quite about the plot, however. Most great books aren't. Yann Martel's "Life of Pi" is more about spirituality and connection than a tiger and a boy on a raft. Eric Carle's "The Very Hungry Caterpillar" is a bold statement on post-modern desire. The idea of "Peace" isn't the family on the road tracking down an outlaw relative. Nor is it about the occasional miracle performed by the father.

Yes, likely he could use his power to get Davy acquitted. He could cure Rube of his severe asthma, maybe. Readers who grow frustrated at the unexpected and sometimes irrelevant and abrupt witnessing of the miracles perhaps miss the point: that Jeremiah's miracles are a means, not an end, and he may not have control over their occurrence. If the family were able to use miracles as a way to get out of jams, dramatic tension would be nonexistent. If they were always used as pivotal plot points, the spirituality in the book would be overbearing or take on the characteristics of one religion or another, limiting its universal appeal.

In an interview with Writers And Books, Enger says, "(I)t's been a happy surprise that many self-described skeptics have enjoyed the novel-I suspect because it tells the story simply, rather than pounding the table."

Of course, skeptics think of spirituality and faith as much as anyone else, and the presentation allows skeptics and agnostics to contemplate the larger questions as much as any other reader. Some thoughts presented by "Peace:" What is right and what is wrong? Was Davy morally correct in shooting the bullies? Is the family right to pull up stakes and chase after him? When do you stand up in your defense, and when do you put off vengeance for another day? How does faith determine how you live your life and how people react to you? That's the ambiguity Enger has introduced in these pages.

In addition, "Peace" is a page-turner, and once the reader is hooked it's almost painful to put it down. On completion, there's a sense that you've just read a very fine novel, the reason learning to read was worth all that bother.

Enger's book is not without its flaws. Swede, though nine, speaks as though she went to a prepubescent Harvard, and the outlaw poetry eats much cheese. The parallels between her poetic outlaw heroes and the real-life outlaw hero are heavy-handed and blunt. Abrupt transitions work in some cases, seeming true-to-life, and in other cases seem awkward and badly paced. If you are gripped from the first chapter, as I was, these flaws won't be too apparent the first time you read it, though they may grate a tad on the second reading. These flaws and others don't ruin the book.

Enger has still turned out a masterpiece, though I wouldn't catapult it to the level of one of the best books of the year. Of 2001's books, I'd highlight "Borrowed Finery" by Paula Fox as a superior work, and given a copy of "Books In Print" for that year I'm sure I could come up with at least nine others.

Still, I can hardly imagine having a better choice for Denver's program. Too good, and there would be no discussion; too bad, and nobody would have read it. Judging by the response I get when carrying "Peace Like A River" on light rail and on campus, it does what it's supposed to do-leads us to discussions about right and wrong and the essence of miracles in everyday life.